By giridhar Posted on 28 Feb 16 at 11:18 pm
Pros Great Looks,Good Performance,Comfort,
Cons Average Fuel Efficiency,
i purchased tata nano xta with high expectations .but disuppoint for millage. it give only 10 kmpl. driving is comfortable. ac is very good.
8 of 9 users found this review helpful.
By CHINMAY BISWAS Posted on 03 Dec 15 at 01:02 pm
Pros Great Looks,Good Performance,Great Interiors,Fuel Efficiency,Comfort,BT Connectivity, Good Acceleration, Ground Clearance, Look, Turning Radius, Boot Space, EVERYTHING.
Cons ,Nothing at this cost.
Exterior TATA has changed the Nano to Smily Look in Front & Rear. Fog Lights are more brighter. Mine is Sangria Red and with additional accessories I have changed the get up with Side Beading, Roof Rail, Chrome in HLTLSide Indicator. Interior Interior has been very nicely arranged by TATA Engineers. Enough legroom in front & rear seat. But it will be great addition if TATA provide spaceat a 1L bottle behind the Handbrake. Although this is not a big issue to keep the knick-knacks at the drivers range. If anyone keep the roof-lamp at door level, it works like visual alarm. If any door is not shut properly, then light will lamp ON until you close the door properly. Yes, tyre noise inside the cabin can be reduced, if you keep the proper tyre pressure as per manual. I have short driven A Segment Cars (M-800, EON, KWID). In comparison to these cars, found NVH level is much more controlled. Music System is with BT Connectivity which is very much useful to receive emergency calls while driving. I drive the car alone so no experience about the rear seat comfort. Additional boot in GENX is very useful but will not serve the purpose of your weekend trip with family. REMOTE KEY is additional benefit to the XT users. Eng Performance FE Gearbox Engine developed by TATA Team is good enough & peppy for city commute and occasionally long trip under limited speed. PLEASE REMEMBER, it is not a racing car. For the common people, who cannot afford high value for 4whl, honble RATAN TATA planned to launch this budgeted car with maximum features. But as per demand & R&D a very good shape has been given to this Little Master. The choice is purely of the reader to opt this budgeted car with all general features or others. AFE, as per MID, showing 20.5KMPL and as per tankful method it is 22.65KMPL (wo ac) in city. Gearbox is very smooth like butter. I have TATA ZEST XT RT, the gear is even smooth than Zest. Regarding drum-brake, one have to use to with this system, keeping in mind that it is not a DISC Brake Car (those who are using GENX as a second car). Always keep safe distance & speed. Areas of Improvement For the improvement, I believe, TATA R&D Worldwide team is working to provide necessary features with very competitiveminimum cost, but as a common man I will expect at least disc brake for this RWD & reverse parking sensor in the top model. Overall Experience Nano was my dream car, after detailed analysis (cost vs featuresspec), I purchased this LITTLE MASTER and very much satisfied. Previously I owned, SANTRO, WAGON-R and now parked Zest-XT(RT) in Oct.2014 & GEN.X-XT(MT) in Nov.2015
13 of 14 users found this review helpful.
By PRABODH MEHTA Posted on 22 May 15 at 02:50 pm
Pros Great Looks,Good Performance,Fuel Efficiency,
Cons Average Interiors,CongestedUncomfortable,High Cost !
I feel that this variant of the tata nano will be unsuccessful as 1) Very High Cost. 2) Average interiors. 3) Very congested. 4) On Exchange of old car they says they will give best market price with exchange bonus of 20,000 which is clean game of making fool to customers. Personal Experience I asked the price of nano 2012 model for evaluation and they said just 50,000 which is worst exchange price. Not Satisfied* 5) Parts are very costly when they are broken. 6) Though the tank has increased but not comfortable for a long journey. 7) It's market value is below low when you want to sell.
45 of 52 users found this review helpful.